The Myths and Symbols of Rings


A man’s choice of rings can tell people many things about them, including their personality, occupation, and relationship status. In fact, wearing a ring on one or both of the hands can tell people about you before you even meet them. Here are some of the most common myths and symbols associated with rings, and what they mean. And which finger should you wear your ring on? Luckily, there’s an easy way to avoid the worst stereotypes.

One myth about rings is that there are no real examples of them. But rings are actually algebraic structures. Some of the most commonly known ones are Annulus rings, geometric rings, and the ring of sets concept from set theory. They are generalized versions of fields, but they require no commutative multiplication or multiplicative inverses. Furthermore, they are equipped with two binary operations – addition and subtraction – that make them useful in geometry and analysis.

The first film in the series was based on a novel by Richard Bachman. The sequel, Rings, follows the same characters from the original film, but has more serious stakes. This time, the characters face the death penalty and are thrown into an increasingly threatening situation. Thankfully, the supernatural elements in the first film aren’t the main plot points of Rings, but the film does contain violent moments and jump scares. Moreover, it is full of blood, beatings, swinging blunt instruments, and falling down stairs. Some of the characters even lie in bed together, and in underwear.

Another popular myth involves rings and safety. Many people don’t consider rings to be a safety risk, but they may not be. Some rings are made of stronger materials than other jewelry, and they can easily encircle a digit. If they catch on something, they can cause serious injury, such as an amputation or ring avulsion. Some people recommend not wearing rings while operating machinery or playing sports. In such cases, they should not be worn during any activity.

Despite its strong feminist undertone, Rings lacks depth in the female characters. It attempts to recontextualize the outsized violence of Samara as a response to male patriarchy and the horrors her mother endured. Yet this approach only succeeds in drumming up sympathy for the protagonist and her family. Unfortunately, Rings fails to develop its characters past their basic identities. If that was the case, the film would be a hit.